AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
12 paragraphs · 172 wordsDevendra Chaudhry, Member (A)
Heard learned counsel for both the parties.
At the outset, Ld. Applicant Counsel is submitting that the interest of justice would be served if the representations dated 02.05.2016 and January,
2018 (Annexure Nos. A-4 and A-5) of the applicant pending with the respondents is directed to be decided by way of a reasoned and speaking order
in a timeframe.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection on the same.
Accordingly, it is directed that the Competent Authority of the amongst respondents shall decide the applicant's representations dated 02.05.2016
and January, 2018 (Annexure Nos. A-4 and A-5) by way of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law, within a period of 02 (Two)
months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. The decision shall be communicated to the applicant forthwith.
It is made clear that no comments as to merits of the case have been passed.
Original Application is disposed of accordingly.
No costs.
