High CourtsSingle Bench

Virbaksh And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 30 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0470

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Kumar Verma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 10959 Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 289 words

Ashok Kumar Verma, J

Case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing due to the outbreak of Pandemic COVID-19.

Through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect

the life and liberty of the newly married petitioners from the hands of private respondents No.4 to 6 and their other companions.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that the petitioners are major and have solemnized their marriage in accordance with law. However, the

private respondents are not accepting their marriage and are adamant to separate them from each other by resorting to illegal means. Learned counsel

further submits that in view of imminent danger to the life and liberty of the petitioners, petitioners have moved a representation dated 23.12.2020

(Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka.

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage.

At the asking of the Court, Mr. Bhupender Beniwal, AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.

The contents of the petition alongwith Annexures thereof have been perused. The present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-

Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, District Fazilka that the contents of the representation dated 23.12.2020 (Annexure P-5) seeking protection of

life and liberty be duly verified and if necessary, requisite steps be taken strictly in accordance with law for grant of protection of life and liberty of the

petitioners. It is clarified that this order shall neither be treated as a stamp of this Court qua marriage of the petitioners nor any reflection on the merits

of the contentions raised by them in the present petition.