High CourtsSingle Bench

Virendra Kumar Yadav vs State of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 15 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 PAT CK 1556

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Anshuman, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7118 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 387 words

Dr. Anshuman, J

1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the Bihar Technical Service Commission and learned Counsel for the State are present.

2.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the present writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs:

(i) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities under the Health Department and Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna to add the petitioners name in the final list published for the document verification in connection with Advertisement No. 23/2025 (Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025) because the petitioner have obtained more than final cut off marks fixed by the respondents.

(ii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authority Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna to issue petitioner's final answer key with respect to Advertisement No. 23/2025 (Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025) or add the experience marks and call for the documents verification.

(iii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ, including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authority, Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna to add the petitioner's experience wattage marks and call for the documents verification and further order to absorb/appoint on the post of Regular Staff Nurse post under the Advertisement No. 23/2025 (Regular Staff Nurse Appointment 2025). And for any other appropriate relief(s) as per the facts and circumstances of the case.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Bihar Technical Service Commission submits that due to a software error, the petitioners could not be called for document verification. After filing of the writ petition, such defects relating to eight persons have been rectified. He further submits, on instructions received, that all the identified eight persons, namely, Rina Kumari, Virendra Kumar Yadav, Amrita Toppo, Surendra Singh Karwasra, Debasis Ghosh, Valsa Ekka, KM. Vimarsha and Shivangi Gupta, including the present petitioners, shall be called for document verification. In this regard, notices shall be issued to them very shortly.

4.

In the light of the submissions made by learned counsel for the Bihar Technical Service Commission, the present writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the Bihar Technical Service Commission, Bihar, Patna, to call the petitioners for document verification within a period of four weeks.