AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
36 paragraphs · 326 wordsPetitioners seek bail under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C . They are
the accused in crime no.2177/2017 of Chathannoor police
station, Kollam district. They have allegedly committed
offences punishable under Secs 323, 324, 326 and 506 of IPC
read with IPC 34.
The prosecution case is this: The accused persons
had previous animosity towards the first informant. At about
4.00 p.m on 10.9.2017 the accused beat the first informant
Jayakrishnan and his friend Vinayak on their heads with iron
bangles and kicked them. Both the victims sustained injuries
and the first informant sustained a grievous injury.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned public prosecutor.
The defence version is that everything happened
during a football match. It is submitted that there was no
premeditation to commit any crime. It is seen stated in the
application that the first informant sustained only minor
injuries.
It is true that it all happened during a football
match. But the injuries sustained by the first informant cannot
be simplified as minor. The records show that he did sustain a
linear undisplaced fracture involving left occipital bone. There
has been a grievous hurt within the meaning of Sec.320 of IPC .
Materials are available against the petitioners to prosecute
them. Investigation is at its initial stage. I do no consider this
to be a fit case to grant bail under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C .
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petitioners wish to surrender before the investigating
officer. The petitioners have the freedom to do so. In the
event of such surrender the investigating officer after
interrogation shall produce the petitioners before the court
concerned within the time allowed by the Cr.P.C . On such
production the court concerned will act according to law. It is
made clear that the investigating officer is under no obligation
to keep on waiting for the surrender of the petitioners.
The application is dismissed.
