High CourtsSingle Bench

Vishal vs State Of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 15 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 P&H CK 0134

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 379A(2), 411
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1428 Of 2021(O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 369 words

Raj Mohan Singh, J

The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.103 dated 12.03.2017 registered under Section 379-A(2) IPC

(Section 411 IPC added later on) at Police Station City Kaithal, District Kaithal.

As per allegations of the complainant, his friend Vishal (petitioner) came to his house on 10.03.2017 at about 3:45 PM and asked him to go Janta

Market to take money from his father. The accused requested him to drop him in the market. On request of Vishal (petitioner), the complainant took

him on

his motorcycle to Janta Market. When he stopped his motorcycle, then Vishal (petitioner) alighted from the motorcycle. When the complainant took

out his mobile to make a call, then Vishal (petitioner) snatched the same and fled away.

During investigation, Vishal (petitioner) and co-accused Sham Lal were arrested. Offence under Section 411 IPC was added. Recovery of mobile

was effected from co-accused Sham Lal. Sham Lal earlier filed CRM-M No.35962 of 2020 and after withdrawal of the same, filed regular bail before

the trial Court, which was accepted on 28.01.2021.

Learned counsel further submitted that at one point of time, the petitioner was declared proclaimed person vide order dated 08.01.2018. He was

arrested on 12.10.2020 and since then, he is in custody. Challan has been submitted, but no prosecution witness has been examined so far.

The factual matrix of the case could not be disputed by the learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Ramesh Chander.

Recovery has been effected from co-accused Sham Lal. Co-accused Sham Lal has been granted regular bail by the trial Court. The trial may take

some time in its culmination.

Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting to the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the

petitioner on regular bail.

In view of above, petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to his furnishing adequate bail bonds/surety bonds to

the satisfaction of the trial Court/concerned Duty Magistrate.

Nothing expressed hereinabove would be construed to be an expression of any opinion on merits of the case.