High CourtsSingle Bench

Vishal vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 7 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 MP CK 0049

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satyendra Kumar Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Madhya Pradesh Excise Act, 1915 — Section 49(A)
RESULT
Allowed/Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 34547 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 368 words

Satyendra Kumar Singh, J

1.

Perused the case diary.

2.

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C for grant of bail to the applicant, as he has been arrested on 27.06.2023 in connection with Crime No.388/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Vidisha (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Section 49 (A) of the Excise Act.

3.

Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 26.06.2023 the applicant was found having 5 litres of illicit spurious liquor for the purpose of sell without having any license.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the matter. He further submits that nothing has been seized from the possession of the applicant. There is nothing on record to suggest that the seized liquor was unfit for human consumption. The applicant is in custody since 27.06.2023. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. His custodial interrogation is not required in the matter. Trial will take time for its conclusion. Hence, prayer is made to enlarge the applicant on bail.

5.

Learned counsel for respondent/State opposes the application, but fairly conceded that the applicant has no criminal antecedents.

6.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

7.

Having considered the rival submissions, material pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicant, quantity of liquor said to be seized from the possession of applicant, custody period o f the applicant, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail, hence, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the applicant be released on bail upon his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before the Trial Court on all such dates as may be fixed in this behalf by the Trial Court during the pendency of trial. It is further directed that applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437 (3) of Cr. P. C.

9.

This application is allowed and stands disposed of.

10.

Certified copy, as per rules.