High CourtsSingle Bench

VISHAL @ VASU BALDEVBHAI RABARI vs STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 29 June 2017 · Citation: (2017) 06 GUJ CK 0012

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.P.Bhatt
CASE NUMBER
1547 of 2016

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

53 paragraphs · 581 words
1.

The present appeal is filed by the appellant challenging the

judgment and order dated 19.10.2016 passed by the learned 4th Additional

Sessions Judge, Mehsana in Special Atrocity Case No.08/2013, whereby

the appellant herein was prosecuted under Sections 323, 325, 504, 506(2)

and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police

Act and Section 3(1)(10) of the Atrocity Act. At the conclusion of the

trial, the appellant is held guilty for the offence punishable under Section

325 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant was directed to undergo

rigorous imprisonment of five years and fine of Rs.7,000/- and in default

thereof, the appellant is required to undergo simple imprisonment for a

period of six months.

2.

With the consent of the parties, the present Criminal Appeal is

taken up today for its final disposal.

3.

Heard learned advocate for the appellant and learned advocate for

the original complainant as well as learned APP for the respondent-State.

4.

Learned advocate for the appellant submits that being aggrieved

and dissatisfied with the aforesaid judgment and order, the appeal is

preferred by the appellant on various grounds enumerated in the appeal

memo, but during the pendency of the appeal, the matter is amicably

settled between the appellant and the original complainant and now the

complainant has no objection if the compounding of offence under

Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is permitted by this

Court.

5.

Learned advocate appearing for the original complainant also

submits that the victim/first informant has filed an affidavit before this

Court, wherein it is categorically stated that due to intervention of elderly

member of the family, friends and other community/social workers, the

matter is amicably settled and now the complainant has no objection, if

the offence is compounded and the impugned judgment and order dated

19.10.2016 is quashed and set aside. It is also submitted that the contents

of the affidavit are read over and explained to the complainant, who is present

before this Court, and the same are admitted by him and the complainant was

identified by learned advocate for the complainant.

6.

Regard being had to the above submissions and looking to the facts

and circumstances as also considering the affidavit filed by the

victim/first informant as also considering the observations made in

Paragraph Nos.9 to 15 by the Hon''ble Supreme Court given in the case of

Khursheed Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [2007 (12) SCC 68] as also the

observations made in Paragraph Nos.8 & 9 by the Hon''ble Supreme Court

given in the case of Dasan Vs. State of Kerala [2014 (12) SCC 666],

which were cited by the learned advocates for the parties, in the instant

case, the offence under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code is required

to be compounded and accordingly, the judgment and order dated

19.10.2016 passed by the learned Trial Court is also required to be set

aside. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the judgment and order

dated 19.10.2016 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge,

Mehsana in Special Atrocity Case No.08/2013 is quashed and set aside.

Accordingly, the appellant is ordered to be acquitted of the charges

levelled against him and he is ordered to be released forthwith for the

alleged offences if not required in any other offence. The bail and bail

bond stands cancelled. Surety, if any, shall stand discharged. Record and

Proceedings be sent back to the Trial Court concerned forthwith.

Direct Service is permitted.