High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 10 KL CK 0083

Viswambharan vs The Excise Inspector, Excise Range Office, Palakkad - 678001 and The Deputy Commissioner of Excise, Palakkad - 678001

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 15 October 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J · A.V. Ramakrishna Pillai, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.A. No. 1837 of 2012 in WPC/20761 of 2012

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 144 words

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.—This writ appeal is filed against the judgment, by which the learned Single Judge has refused to order interim release of the vehicle of the petitioner pending confiscation proceedings under the provisions of the Abkari (Disposal of Confiscated Articles) Rules, 1996 (Kerala). It is pointed out by the learned Government Pleader that the Deputy Excise Commissioner, Palakkad, has issued proceedings dated 09/10/2012 ordering confiscation of the Mahindra Bolero vehicle involved in the excise offence concerned. With that, we are of the view that the High Court should not further deliberate on the question of any interim release pending confiscation proceedings. The owner of the vehicle may have a right of appeal under the Abkari Act against the confiscation order. It is for him to seek interlocutory orders from the appellate authority concerned. Subject to the aforesaid, this writ appeal is dismissed.