High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 BOM CK 0084

Vyankatrao S/o Khushalrao vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 18 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manish Pitale
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
270 of 1995

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

39 paragraphs · 396 words
1.

By this appeal, the appellants/claimants have challenged

the judgment and order dated 21.01.1995 passed by the Civil Judge,

Senior Division, Pusad (herein after referred to as "Reference Court")

in LAC No. 432/1992, whereby, while partly allowing the reference

application of the appellants, enhanced compensation has been granted

at the rate of Rs. 55,000/- per hectare while the appellant had claimed

compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,00,000/- per hectare.

2.

The land belonging to the appellants located at Gat No. 58

of village Chincholi, Taluka Digras, District Yavatmal admeasuring 5

Hectare 14 Are, was acquired for which Notification under Section 4 of

the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was issued on 06.02.1986 and the

award was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer on 04.03.1989. The

appellants were granted compensation at the rate of Rs. 14,000/- per

hectare under the award. Aggrieved by the same, the predecessor of

the appellant had preferred reference application under Section 18 of

the said Act, which was decided by the impugned judgment and award

passed by the Reference Court. The compensation payable to the

appellants for acquisition on their lands was enhanced by the Reference

Court to Rs. 55,000/- per hectare. The appellants have filed this appeal

seeking further enhancement of compensation.

3.

During the pendency of this appeal, on 31.10.2014, this

Court has passed judgment and order in First Appeal No. 204/1999

concerning the acquisition of land from the same village, pursuant to

the same Notification dated 06.02.1986 issued under Section 4 of the

said Act. In the said judgment, it has been held by this Court that the

claimants are entitled to enhanced compensation at the rate of Rs.

1,00,000/- per hectare. Therefore, applying the principle of parity, the

appellants herein are also entitled for enhancement of compensation.

Accordingly, this appeal is allowed and it is held that the appellants

shall be paid compensation at the rate of Rs. 1,00,000/- per hectare

along with statutory benefits, except interest on the enhanced

compensation for the period between 31.01.2007 to 07.09.2017, in

terms of order of this Hon''ble Court dated 07.09.2017, when the appeal

was restored as it had been earlier dismissed-in-default for non-filing of

private paper book.

4.

The appeal is allowed in above terms with no order as to

costs.

5.

Needless to say, the additional court fees shall be deposited

in proportion to the amount of enhanced compensation.