High CourtsSingle Bench

Waseem vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 November 2024 · Citation: (2024) 11 UK CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 111(2)(ii), 303(2), 317(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2202 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 119 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.386 of 2024, under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), and 111(2)(ii) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station- Kashipur, District- Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

4.

The bail application is allowed.

5.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.