High CourtsDivision Bench

Waseem Khan vs State Through Principal Secretary, Home, U.K. & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 July 2022 · Citation: (2022) 07 UK CK 0024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vipin Sanghi, CJ · R.C. Khulbe, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (CRL) No. 1127 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 238 words

Vipin Sanghi, CJ

1.

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to release him on parole for a period of fifteen days to attend the Aqiqah ceremony of his son.

2.

The petitioner’s request for parole has been rejected by the respondents on the ground that under the Rules, Aqiqah is not enumerated as a ceremony for which parole could be applied.

3.

We observe that under the Rules, there is no prohibition against grant of parole for the aforesaid reason. That apart, the Superintendent of Police (Crime), Dehradun has also given his no objection for release of the petitioner on parole for the period of fifteen days, so that, he could make arrangements and attend the Aqiqah ceremony of his son.

4.

Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate General, states that the last time, when the petitioner was released on parole, was in the year 2017.

5.

Since five years have elapsed since then, we are inclined to allow the present writ petition. Accordingly, we allow the present writ petition, and direct that the petitioner be released on parole for a period of fifteen days to enable him to attend the Aqiqah ceremony of his son upon his furnishing his personal bond with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Trial Court concerned. The period of parole shall be counted from the date of his release.

6.

Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.