High CourtsSingle Bench

X vs State Of Sikkim & Anr

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 8 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 SIK CK 0395

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 07 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 138 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Rahul Rathi, learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that he is unwell and therefore, unable to appear before this Court today. She seeks an adjournment which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant as well as respondent no.1.

2.

Although this Court was of the opinion that the matter should be heard at the earliest, a request is made on behalf of Mr. Rahul Rathi, learned counsel for respondent no.2, on the ground that he is unwell, is proceeding to Vellore for medical treatment and will be returning only on 19.07.2026.

3.

Accordingly, post this matter on 27.07.2026 on which date the learned counsel are requested to be ready to argue the interim application which is pending for a considerable long time.