AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
31 paragraphs · 588 wordsGopinath P., J
This is an application for regular bail.
Petitioner is the accused in Crime No. 428/2021 of Mankada police station, Malappuram district, alleging commission of offence under Section
376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and section 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner entered into a relationship with the victim and committed sexual assault and rape on her on two
specific occasions, once in the year 2017and later, in the year 2021.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that going by the contents of the First Information Statement, the petitioner and the
victim were studying together and were in a relationship. It is submitted that on the date of the alleged incident in the year 2017, both the petitioner and
the victim girl were juveniles. It is submitted that in respect of the second incident in the year 2021, both the petitioner and the victim girl had attained
the age of majority and any relationship between them was purely consensual. It is submitted that even in the First Information statement, the victim
girl has clearly stated that she had gone along with the petitioner voluntarily.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the grant of bail. It is submitted that this Court by order dated 19.01.2022 had granted an interim bail to the
petitioner considering the submission that there is a possibility that the petitioner and the victim girl might get married to each other. It is presently
reported that the parents of the victim are not interested in the victim marrying the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner
are serious and he is not entitled to be released on bail. It is also submitted that the medical examination of the victim supports the allegations made
against the petitioner.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the petitioner is aged only 21 years and considering the fact
that he was in custody from 25.12.2021 till 20.01.2022 and also considering the fact that his continued detention may not be necessary for the purpose
of investigation and also taking note of the admitted relationship between the parties, I am of the view that the petitioner can be released on bail,
subject to strict conditions. Accordingly, this application for bail is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail subject to the
following conditions:-
(i) The petitioner shall execute bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like-sum to the satisfaction of the
jurisdictional court;
(ii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No. 428/2021 of Mankada Police station on every Saturday at 11 am until filing of final report;
(iii) The petitioners shall not attempt to interfere with the investigation or to influence or intimidate the victim or any witness in Crime No.428/2021 of Mankada. police
station;
(iv) The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the jurisdictional court. If the petitioner does not have a passport, he shall execute an affidavit to that effect and
file the same before the said court within seven days of release on bail;
(v) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.
If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No..428/2021 of Mankada police station may file an application before
the jurisdictional court, for cancellation of bail.
