High CourtsSingle Bench

Yadayya vs State of Karnataka and Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 22 March 2013 · Citation: (2013) 3 KarLJ 541 : (2013) 4 KCCR 3187

HON’BLE JUDGES
D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 100708 of 2013 (LR-RES)

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 161 words

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.—This writ petition is directed against the order dated 30-10-2012 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Sedam in exercising his power u/s 79-A and 79-B read with Section 83 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (for short, ''Act''), filed by a person who is not a party to the order, but claims that he is the father of the third respondent who was a party to the order. In the first instance the writ petitioner questioning the order in writ jurisdiction is a little far-fetched and more so, when the third respondent or even the fourth respondent who has suffered the adverse order has not questioned the same.

2.

Be that as it may, even otherwise, the impugned order is appealable u/s 118 of the Act. Therefore, this writ petition is not entertained and the same is dismissed without prejudice to the rights and remedies of the petitioner, which can be availed of elsewhere, in accordance with law.