High CourtsSingle Bench

Yamuna Bind @ Jamuna Bind vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 30 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 PAT CK 0268

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 341, 448, 504, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30704 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 461 words
1.

Heard Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

(hereinafter referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur (Belaon) PS Case No. 105 of 2020 dated 22.06.2020, instituted under Sections

147/148/149/341/323/448/307/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner and others is of assault on the informant side and specifically against the petitioner that he inflicted axe blow on

the head of the informant resulting in injury.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the FIR has been lodged after 12 days of the incident which itself shows the falsity of the

allegation. It was submitted that for the same incident, the father of the petitioner has lodged Bhagwanpur (Belaon) PS Case No. 94 of 2020 on

13.06.2020 itself with regard to the same incident and that too from the hospital where he was undergoing treatment. Learned counsel submitted that

as a counter blast, this false case has been registered. Learned counsel drew the attention of the Court to the injury report, copy of which has been

brought on record as Annexure-3 to this application, which falsifies the story of attack by axe as there is only a simple lacerated wound on the parietal

region caused by hard blunt substance. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and the incident occurred due to

dispute relating to construction of drainage.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the allegation is of assault by axe. However, he did not controvert that the injuries were simple and only lacerated

wound on right parietal region of the skull.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in Bhagwanpur

(Belaon) PS Case No. 105 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and further, (i) that

one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of

the petitioner, and (iii) that the petitioner shall cooperate in the case and be present before the Court on each and every date. Failure to cooperate or

being absent on two consecutive dates, without sufficient cause, shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.