High CourtsSingle Bench

Yash Bindlish & Ors vs State & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 October 2018 · Citation: (2018) 10 DEL CK 0224

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 406, 498A
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous CaseNo.5236 OF 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 412 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

Crl. M.A. 34145/2018 (Exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CRL.M.C. 5236/2018

1.

Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 75 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Greater Kailash, Â New Delhi, based

on a settlement. Â

2.

Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Â

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their disputes and settlement dated 25.06.2018 has been executed between the

parties. Petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 have amicably dissolved their marriage by mutual consent and decree of divorce dated 25.06.2018 has

been passed.

4.

As per the settlement, a total sum of Rs. 40 lakhs has been agreed to be paid by the petitioners to respondent no. 2 in full and final settlement of all

the claims of respondent no. 2. A sum of Rs. 35 lakhs has already been paid and the balance sum of Rs. 5 lakhs is being paid by way of DD/Bankers

Cheque No. 146090 dated 01.10.2018 issued by Canara Bank to respondent no. 2, today in Court. The above amount of Rs. 40 lakhs have been paid

apart from the return of agreed articles. Parties confirm that all articles have been returned.

5.

Respondent No.2 is present in person, represented by her counsel and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled her

disputes with the petitioners and does not wish to press charges against the petitioners and prosecute the complaint any further.

6.

In view of the fact that the proceedings emanate out of a matrimonial discord and the parties have fully and finally settled their disputes and the

respondent No.2 has stated that she does not wish to press the complaint any further and the fact that the parties have already been divorced by way

of a decree of divorce, passed on 14.09.2018, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that

the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be

expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.

7.

In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No. 75 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Greater Kailash,

New Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.

8.

Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.