AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
3 paragraphs · 215 wordsBala Krishna Narayana, J.—Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The applicant, through the present application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer that his bail application in Case crime No. 89 of 2010 arising out of Case No. 9097 of 2010 State v. Chand Babu and Ors. under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506 IPC., P.S. Nawabganj, District Allahabad be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible, on the same day by the Courts below.
After hearing learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. this application is finally disposed of with a direction that if the applicant appears and surrenders before the Court below within four weeks from today and applies for bail, then his application shall be considered and decided by the Courts below, if possible, on the same day in accordance with law laid down by the Seven Judges'' decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and Anr. v. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon''ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offence.
