High CourtsSingle Bench

Yashpal Singh vs Sandesh & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0290

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1621 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 197 words

@JUDGMENTaxTAG-JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioner has challenged election of respondent no. 1 as Pradhan of Gram Sabha Naugaon, Block Sahaspur, District Haridwar by filing an Election

Petition before Prescribed Authority/ S.D.M., Vikasnagar, Dehradun. The said Election Petition is numbered as 01 of 2020. By means of this writ

petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the Court concerned to expedite hearing of the Election Petition.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has apprised the Court that notice of the Election Petition has been served upon the returned candidate and he

assures the Court that petitioner shall take all possible steps to effect service upon other respondents, if already not served, within two weeks.

3.

Since the Election Petition was filed by the petitioner in the month of January, 2020 and more than eighteen months have gone by, therefore, the

writ petition is disposed of with a request of Prescribed Authority/S.D.M., Vikasnagar, Dehradun to hear & decide Election Petition No. 01 of 2020 as

early as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that any

unnecessary adjournment shall be avoided.