High CourtsSingle Bench

Yogesh Kumar @ Rinku vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 29 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 RAJ CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 21, 22, 29
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1130 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 436 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.113/2020 registered at Police Station Sadar, District Bikaner registered for the offence punishable under Section 8/21, 22 and 29 of NDPS Act.

The first bail application was dismissed as not pressed by this Court vide order dated 29.11.2022 with liberty to file afresh after recording the statement of Investigating Officer.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and he has been implicated in this case under the aid of Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act. Counsel submits that the main accused Sharwan Singh has named co-accused Khim Singh & Jitendra, Khim Singh is still absconding and Jitendra has been exonerated by the Police. The money transaction has been done in the account of co-accused Jitendra and the present petitioner has nothing to do with this crime. The petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.04.2022 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time. With these submissions, it is prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer of bail and submits that one another case of similar nature is pending against the accused-petitioner, therefore, benefit of bail may not be granted to him.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, looking to the fact that in another case also the accused-petitioner has been implicated under the aid of Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act and in that case the accused-petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and he is in custody since 21.04.2022, therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Yogesh Kumar @ Rinku S/o Gopal Parsad shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No.113/2020 registered at Police Station Sadar, District Bikaner provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.