High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 11 RAJ CK 0055

Yogesh Kumar Son of Shri Tola Ram vs Chandra Shekar S/o Prakash Bihari

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 20 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gopal Krishan Vyas
CASE NUMBER
382 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

51 paragraphs · 547 words
1.

Heard.

2.

The instant criminal revision petition has been filed under

Section 397 / 401 of Cr.P.C. against the judgment dated

15.11.2017 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.4, Bikaner

in Criminal Appeal No.55/2017 (Yogesh Kumar Vs. Chandra

Shekhar & Anr., whereby the appellate court dismissed the appeal

filed by the petitioner and affirmed the judgment dated

29.03.2016 passed by Special Judicial Magistrate (NI Act Cases)

No.2, Bikaner whereby the petitioner was convicted for offence u/s

138 of the N.I. Act and sentence of one year and ten days was

passed. The petitioner was further directed to pay compensation

of Rs.3,04,800/-, and in default of payment of fine, to further

undergo one month''s simple imprisonment.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention

towards compromise-deed took placed on 17.11.2017 at Bikaner,

in which it is specifically observed that amount of cheque has

already been received by the complainant. The said compromise-

deed is hereby taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner

thus prayed that the sentence awarded to the petitioner may

kindly be suspended.

4.

I have considered the rival arguments advance by the

parties and perused the judgments of the courts below. Looking

to the facts and circumstances of the case and the short sentence

awarded by the learned trial court, I consider it just and proper to

suspend the sentences awarded to the accused petitioner-

applicant.

5.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (N.I.

Act Cases), No.2, Bikaner in Cr. Case No.350/2013 vide order

dated 29.03.2016 as affirmed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge No.4, Bikaner vide order dated 15.11.2017 in Cr. Appeal

No.55/2017 against the petitioner-applicant Yogesh Kumar Son of

Shri Tola Ram, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail, provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one

surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge

for his appearance in this court on 20.12.2017 and whenever

ordered to do so, till the disposal of the revision on the conditions

indicated below:-

1.

That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the revision is decided. 2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court. 3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.