AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
28 paragraphs · 248 wordsThe petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR
No.855 dated06.06.2017 under Section 174-A IPC, registered at
Police Station City Jagadhri, District Yamuna Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that
petitioner was accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act and the matter has been settled with the
complainant as entire payment has been made by the petitioner.
He further contends that petitioner was not served at his address
before the order declaring him proclaimed offender was passed.
In support of his contentions, he has relied upon the judgment of
a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of " Microqual
Techno Limited and others v. State of Haryana and
another " 2015 (32) RCR (Criminal) 790.
This Court, by the order dated 12.10.2017, had
directed the petitioner to join investigation and in the event of his
arrest, he was ordered to be released on ad-interim bail to the
satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer, subject to the
conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
Learned State counsel, upon instructions from ASI
Surinder Kumar, states that in pursuance to the order dated
12.10.2017, the petitioner has joined investigation and is not
required for custodial interrogation.
In view of the above and without expressing any
opinion on the merits of case, the order dated 12.10.2017,
granting ad-interim bail to the petitioner, is hereby made
absolute. However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions
envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly.
