High CourtsSingle Bench

Yoginder Sharma and Others vs State of Haryana and Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 11 February 2009 · Citation: (2009) 02 P&H CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajan Gupta, J
RESULT
Allowed

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 203 words

Rajan Gupta, J.—The petitioners have filed this petition u/s 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 139 dated 15th November, 2006, under Sections 406, 498-A, 323, 506 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 20, Panchkula (Annexure P-1) and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties.

2.

Complainant/respondent No. 2 is present in Court. She is duly identified by her counsel. She has filed an affidavit, admitting therein the factum of com promise (Annexure P-2) arrived at between the parties. She states that she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

3.

The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings, which would be a futile exercise.

4.

In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Cri.) 1052.

5.

Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.