High CourtsSingle Bench

Yuvraj @ Santosh Patail vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 May 2021 · Citation: (2021) 05 CHH CK 0016

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajani Dubey, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 2241 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 482 words

Rajani Dubey, J

1.

The accused/applicant has moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing him on regular bail during

trial in connection with Crime No.128/2021 registered at Police Station Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34

(2) and 59 (A) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915.

2.

It is the case of the prosecution that 15.000 bulk liters of illicit country made liquor was seized by the police from the custody of applicant and

thereby committed the offence.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that as the

applicant is in custody since 07.03.2021 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, he may be released on bail.

4.

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

5.

Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59-A(ii) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915, and bearing in mind the principles of law laid

down in Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (M.Cr.C. No.6846 of 2014), decided on 05.01.2015), if the facts of present case are examined, it is

apparent that only 15.000 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from him which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact

that the applicant is in custody since 07.03.2021, case is triable by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, trial is likely to take some more time and further

taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion

that present is the fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety in the like sum to

the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions:

7.

That, the applicant shall furnish a specific, undertaking that while on bail, he will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to him shall

be liable to be cancelled and shall co-operate the prosecution during trial.

8.

That, the accused/applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating Officer as and when required and the

accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

9.

That, the accused/applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial.

10.

I.A.No.02/2021, for hearing during summer vacation stands disposed of.