High CourtsSingle Bench

Ziyad. K vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 8 August 2022 · Citation: (2022) 08 KL CK 0063

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354D(1)(ii), 506(i) · Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 67B(b) · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 11(iii)(iv)(v), 12, 13(c), 14(l)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 5727 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 417 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1.

This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.201 of 2022 of Koppam Police Station, Palakkad registered for the offences punishable under Sections 354D(1)(ii), 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also under Sections 67(B)(b) of  the  Information  Technology  Act,  2000  and  Section 12 r/w. Section 11(iii)(iv)(v), Section 14(l) r/w. Section 13(c) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3.

The prosecution case is that, between 01.12.2021 and 06.06.2022, the petitioner, by giving a false promise of marriage, induced the victim to send her nude photographs to his mobile phone and circulated the same to his friends and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4.

Sri.Santheep   Ankarath,   the   learned   counsel   for   the petitioner submitted that the entire prosecution case is false and that petitioner is innocent of the allegations.

5.

Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, the learned Public Prosecutor, opposed the grant of bail and submitted that petitioner had circulated nude photographs obtained from the victim to his friends and thereby committed a heinous crime.

6.

On 29.06.2022, this Court had dismissed the pre-arrest bail application of the petitioner. Subsequently, he was arrested on 01.07.2022 and has been in custody since then.

7.

Having regard to the nature of allegations and the detention of the petitioner from the date above mentioned, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required in the circumstances of the case. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

8.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the victim or her family members.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offence while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.