High CourtsSingle Bench

Zora Singh vs Harnarain Singh and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 May 1994 · Citation: (1994) 107 PLR 692

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.K. Kapoor, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 22 Rule 9
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Regular Second Appeal No. 1643 of 1979
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 215 words

N.K. Kapoor, J.—In the pending appeal, respondent Harnarain Singh has filed affidavit today in Court stating that Zora Singh, the sole appellant died on 9.12.1982. It is further stated that till today no application has been filed to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of Zora Singh and thus, appeal stands abated.

2.

Earlier too, identical objection was raised by the learned counsel for the respondents and counsel for the appellant sought time to verify this assertion of the respondents'' counsel.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellant in all fairness conceded that appeal stands abated in view of the affidavit sworn by Harnarain Singh coupled with the fact that despite many reminders none has come present from any of the legal representatives of Zora Singh.

4.

Keeping in view the facts duly sworn in, the present appeal stands abated and is, consequently dismissed. Heirs and legal representatives of Zora Singh have not cared to put in appearance despite communication addressed to them by the counsel for the appellant. Needless to say that heirs and legal representatives of Zora Singh can file appropriate application in terms of Order 22 Rule 9 of the CPC if so advised.

5.

In view of what has been noticed above, the appeal stands abated and is consequently dismissed.