High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajay Sharma vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 23 November 2023 · Citation: (2023) 11 MP CK 0064

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunita Yadav, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 15, 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 51720 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 494 words

Sunita Yadav, J

Heard on I.A. No. 21507 of 2023, an application for amendment.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, I.A. No. 21507 of 2023 is allowed.

Necessary amendment has been carried out by the applicant on Board itself.

This is the first application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail relating to FIR No.493 of 2023 registered at Police Station Badauda, District Sheopur (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 8/15 and 8/25 of NDPS Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated. Doda Chuda has not been seized from the possession of the applicant - accused and he was not even found present at the time of seizure. He has been arrayed as an accused on account of memorandum of co-accused who was using the applicant's motorcycle. It is further argued that the applicant is in custody since 01.11.2023. Co-accused Saif Ali Khan has already been granted bail. Further argument is that applicant is the permanent resident of District Sheopur (M.P.) and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the bail application and prayed for its dismissal.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties and perused the case diary available on record.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 (Rupees One Lakh Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court/committal Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-

1) The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3) The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused;

5) The applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6 ) The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

Learned State counsel is directed to send an e-copy of this order to the Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station for information and necessary action.

E- copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance, if possible, by the office of this Court.

Certified copy today as per rules.