High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajay Solanki vs State Of MP

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 18 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 MP CK 0099

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 437(3), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 363, 366 · Protection Of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 7, 8, 11, 12
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.2750 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 452 words

Rajendra Kumar Verma, J

This is first application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail on behalf of the applicant, who is in custody since 11/08/2021 in connection with

Crime No.593/2021 registered at Police Station â€" Barwani, District Barwani(M.P.), for the offence punishable under sections 363, 366 of IPC and

under Section 7/8 & 11/12 of POCSO Act, 2012.

According to the prosecution case, a missing report was lodged by the complainant â€" Isram stating that on 08/08/2021 when his daughter had gone

to the market with her friend Sanjeela and when they were on the way to market, the present applicant came on a motorcycle and took the

prosecutrix with him. On the basis of the aforesaid, a case has been registered against the present applicant.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the

prosecutrix had gone with the applicant according to her own wish. There is no iota of material to show that the applicant has committed any offence

with the prosecutrix. He further submits that at the most offence under Section 363 of IPC is made out against the present applicant, which is a

bailable offence, but no case under Section 366 of IPC is made out against him. The investigation is over and charge-sheet has been filed. The

applicant is in custody since 11/08/2021. The conclusion of trial will take sufficient time. On the aforesaid grounds, prayer is made to release the

applicant on bail.

Learned Panel Lawyer has opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, on a perusal of the material available on record including the case diary, without commenting on

the merits of the case, this application is allowed.

It is directed that the applicant/accused be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)

with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court for securing his presence before the said Court on all the dates of

hearing fixed in this regard during trial. It is also directed that the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

In view of the outbreak of 'Corona Virus disease (COVID-19)' the concerned jail authorities are directed to follow the directions/guidelines issued by

the Government with regard to 'COVID-19' before releasing the applicant.

This order shall remain effective till the end of the trial but in case of bail jump and breach of any of the pre-condition of bail, it shall become

ineffective and cancelled without reference to this Bench.

Certified Copy as per rules.