High CourtsSingle Bench

Ajit Jain vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 16 June 2023 · Citation: (2023) 06 RAJ CK 0028

HON’BLE JUDGES
Madan Gopal Vyas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 21 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5727 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 273 words

Madan Gopal Vyas, J

1.

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 182/2023 of Police Station – Phalodi, District Jodhpur Rural for the offence punishable under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this present case. It is further submitted that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3) Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender.

4) Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

5) Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Ajit Jain S/o Bhuralal Jain shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 182/2023 of Police Station – Phalodi, District Jodhpur Rural, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty.