AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 301 wordsMadan Gopal Vyas, J
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.53/2024 of Police Station – RIICO Area, District - Barmer for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 and 29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
2) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this present case. It is further submitted that the recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. It is also submitted that co-accused Ameda Ram @ Amu has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.03.2024. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case will take long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
3) Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender.
4) Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
5) Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Krishna Kumar @ Karna Ram S/o Duda Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.53/2024 of Police Station – RIICO Area, District - Barmer, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty.
