High CourtsSingle Bench

Akram Pathan vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 26 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 RAJ CK 0618

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 161, 164, 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 342, 376(D), 447 · Protection Of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 3, 4
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2450 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 338 words

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R.

No.342/2019, Police Station Mandal, District Bhilwara, for the offences under Sections 447, 342 and 376(D) of IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act,

2012.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations against the present petitioner are similar with Amjad. The police has not filed

charge sheet against Amjad. He further submits that as per the statements of the prosecutrix, the incident has taken place six months ago and the

F.I.R. has been registered after a delay of six months. There is no explanation for the delay of six months in lodging the F.I.R in the present case.

Even as per the statements of the prosecutrix recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C, it appears that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in

this case. The charge sheet in the case has been filed. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner

may be enlarged on bail.

The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the

arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

Consequently, the present bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Akram Pathan S/o

Mubarik Khan Pathan arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 342/2019, Police Station Mandal, District Bhilwara shall be released on bail; provided he

furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees : Twenty Five Thousand Only) each

to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

so.