AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 265 wordsHeard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-
That the instant Public Interest Litigation is being filed before this Hon'ble High Court for directing the respondents State to take all measures for
ensuring removal of Encroachment, which is said to have been made by some of the residents of the locality over the Public Road connecting the
Kankarbag Main Road (old By pass) through Naya Tola, Kumhrar to New by pass, Patna, situated over Mauja-Kumhrar, Thana No. 12, Khata No.
577 and 495, Khesra No. 27, 26, 731, 25/1581 and 128, as per the report of the Revenue Karmachari, by constructing a house which consequently,
very often occasions Traffic Jam, by causing great hindrance in free flow of the traffic.
After the matter was heard for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the
respondent no. 3 District Magistrate, Patna, to consider and decide the representation with respect to grievances raised in such representation.
Learned counsel for the respondent states that if such representation is filed before the respondent no. 3 District Magistrate, Patna, same shall be
considered and decided within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.
Equally liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
Liberty reserved to petitioner to approach the court, if the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action.
The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
