AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
14 paragraphs · 260 wordsPetitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
(i)That, this application is being filed by way of Public Interest Litigation to command/direct respondents concerned to make prayer from any
Construction over the Canal which was/is used for the purpose at Irrigation etc. in terms of notification/ policy of the State of Bihar as contained in
Letter no. 655(6) dated 16.6.16 (Annexure-5).
(ii) Issued by the Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of land Revenue, Bihar whereby and whereunder the state has taken a policy to free the water bodies
from encroachment, but the instant matter the respondents bent upon overlooking he construction of Road over the canal in the locality of village
Jamauli, Rajpur, Buxar used by villagers for irrigation and restore the canal.
After the matter was heard for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the
respondent no. 2 District Magistrate, Buxar, to consider and decide the representation with respect to grievances raised in such representation.
Learned counsel for the respondent states that if such representation is filed before the respondent no. 2 District Magistrate, Buxar, same shall be
considered and decided within a period of two months from the date of receipt of such representation in accordance with law.
Equally liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.
Liberty reserved to petitioner to approach the court, if the need so arises subsequently on the same and subsequent cause of action.
The writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
