High CourtsSingle Bench

Amal Sundaran vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 21 February 2024 · Citation: (2024) 02 KL CK 0176

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.S.Dias, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 143, 147, 148, 149, 308, 323, 324, 341, 427, 447
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 212 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 389 words

C.S.Dias, J

1.

The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.

2.

The petitioner is the second accused in Crime No.1329/2023 of the Pudukkad Police Station, Thrissur, registered against him, for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 447, 323, 324, 427 and 308 read with Sec.149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

When the bail application came up for consideration on 31.1.2024, this Court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer within seven days from the date of order and subject himself to interrogation.

4.

Heard; Sri. E.Vijin Karthik, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Shynimol V.O, the learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

5.

The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that, pursuant to the order dated 31.1.2024, the petitioner surrendered before the Investigating Officer and his interrogation has been completed. The petitioner’s further presence is not required. Hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. The said submission is recorded.

Resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 31.1.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the Investigating Officer directs;

(ii) The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;

(iii)The petitioner shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.

(iv) The petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the jurisdictional Court;

(v) In case of violation of any of the conditions above, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.

(vi) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below.

(vii) Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].