AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 433 wordsC.S.Dias, J
The application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973, for an order of pre-arrest bail.
The petitioner is the second accused in Crime No.1511/2023 of the Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, registered against the accused ( two in number), for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
When the bail application came up for consideration on 15.03.2024, this Court passed an interim order, by directing the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer within seven days from the date of order and subject himself for interrogation.
Heard; Sri.Biju Balakrishnan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Smt.Neema T.V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
Today, when the bail application was taken up for hearing, the learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had appeared on 20.3.2024 and 21.3.2024 before the Investigating Officer and his interrogation was completed. The petitioner’s further presence is not required. Hence, the interim order can be made absolute, subject to additional conditions. The said submission is recorded.
Resultantly, the bail application is disposed of by making the interim order dated 15.3.2024 absolute, subject to the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation and for the purpose of investigation as and when the Investigating Officer directs;
(ii) The petitioner shall not intimidate witnesses or interfere with the investigation in any manner;
(iii) The petitioner shall not get involved in any other offence while on bail.
(iv) The petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the jurisdictional Court;
(v) The petitioner shall surrender his passport, if any, before the court below at the time of execution of the bond. If he has no passport, he shall file an affidavit to the effect before the court below on the date of execution of the bond;
(vi) In case of violation of any of the conditions above, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation of bail, if any filed, and pass orders on the same, in accordance with law.
(vii) Applications for deletion/modification of the bail conditions shall also be filed before the court below.
(viii)Needless to mention, it would be well within the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate the matter and, if necessary, to effect recoveries on the information, if any, given by the petitioner even while the petitioner is on bail as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another [2020 (1) KHC 663].
