High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 KL CK 0457

Amina Abdul Azeez (Minor) vs Erumapetty Grama Panchayat Mangad, Kottappuram P.O., Thrissur District, Pin-680 584 Represented By Its Secretary

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 30 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sathish Ninan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 10517 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 237 words

Sathish Ninan, J

1.

In order to put up a building in the property, the petitioner obtained Ext.P1 Development Permit and Ext.P2 Building Permit. Pursuant thereto,

Ext.P5 order granting transit pass was issued by the third respondent Geologist. The grievance of the petitioner is that the extraction and removal of

earth in terms of the permit is interdicted by the second respondent Panchayat which has no authority to do so.

2.

On a reading of Ext.P9 stop memo issued by the Panchayat it appears that, the allegation is that the petitioner is removing earth from property other

than that in respect of which the building and development permits have been issued.

3.

I do not think it necessary to go into the question regarding jurisdiction of the second respondent to issue an order in the nature of Ext.P9. It would

be sufficient if the third respondent-Geologist conducts a site inspection and ascertains the facts with reference to Exts.P1, P2 permits and P5 order.

The third respondent shall ensure that earth is removed only in terms of the permits and from the site specified therein. If the third respondent finds

that there has been any illegal excavation, it will be open for him to initiate appropriate proceedings. Let inspection be conducted and orders passed

within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Writ Petition is disposed of as above.