AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
26 paragraphs · 243 wordsHeard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the
Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The father of the petitioner was a primary teacher,
who died in harness on 07th July, 2016. The petitioner has filed the
instant writ application for a direction to the respondents to consider
his case for compassionate appointment on account of death of the
bread earner of the family. According to the petitioner, the matter is
pending before respondent No. 4, the District Programme Officer,
Siwan.
In the matters of compassionate appointment, the
respondents are required to take a final decision at the earliest, so
that the family of the deceased may not disturb financially on
account of the death of the bread earner of the family.
This writ application is, accordingly, disposed of
with a direction to the respondent No. 4, the District Programme
Officer, Siwan to take a final decision in the matter of
compassionate appointment of the petitioner at the earliest,
preferably within a period of three months from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order.
Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are under obligation to
place the case of the petitioner before the appropriate authority
within the aforesaid period, so that necessary order in the matter of
compassionate appointment may be passed and the case of the
petitioner, one way or the other, is finally decided.
With the aforesaid observations, the writ application
stands disposed of.
