High CourtsSingle Bench

Amjad And Another vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 1 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 UK CK 0001

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 307
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2208 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 144 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicants Amjad and Wasim are in judicial custody in FIR No.214 of 2023, under Sections 307 and 34 IPC, Police Station- Kankhal, District- Haridwar. They have sought their release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail.

4.

This fact is not disputed by learned State Counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.