High CourtsSingle Bench

Shah Aalam & Others vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 19 January 2023 · Citation: (2023) 01 UK CK 0126

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 325, 352, 452
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 173 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 161 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicants-Shah Aalam, Shamim Ahmad @ Paatu and Mohammad Rafi are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.141 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 452, 325, 323 & 307 IPC, Police Station Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. They have sought their release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that the co-accused having similar role have already been granted bail by this Court. It is a case of parity.

4.

This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail. Accordingly, the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them to the satisfaction of the court concerned.