High CourtsSingle Bench

Anand Kumar Ojha vs Ramesh Kumar Agarwal

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 20 September 2024 · Citation: (2024) 09 SIK CK 0010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal From Judgment And Decree In Suit No. 1 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 108 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

The order dated 13.05.2024 reflects that the appellant was present in person and submitted that he would like to deposit the disputed amount within a period of a month and a half. Time was granted as prayed for. However, although the matter has been listed on various dates no effort has been made to deposit the said amount as prayed for by the appellant.

Today, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has filed an application for seeking exemption to deposit the decretal amount which is however in defect. The application is not on record.

List this matter for hearing on 03.10.2024.