High CourtsSingle Bench

Anand Kumar Ojha vs Ramesh Kumar Agarwal

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 18 November 2024 · Citation: (2024) 11 SIK CK 0019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal From Judgment And Decree In Suit No. 01 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 124 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The appellant has not deposited the admitted amount decreed by the Court nor provided any security in the present appeal. Time is being sought to file further documents. On the closer look there seems to be some apparent errors in the impugned judgment of the trial court on the quantum of amount payable by the appellant to the respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the parties on instructions from their respective clients state that they are willing to explore the possibility of settlement through Mediation. In such view of the matter, the case is referred to Mediation to explore the possibility of settlement.

2.

List this matter after the report is received from the Sikkim State Legal Services Authority.