AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 390 wordsPetitioner through his natural guardian mother, has preferred this revision-petition aggrieved by orders dated 22.10.2019 passed by The Special Judge,
Protection of children from sexual offences Act, 2012 and Child Rights Protection Commission Act, 2005, Sikar and order dated 1.10.2019 passed by
the Juvenile Justice Board, Sikar vide which the application filed under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice {Care and Protection of Children} Act, 2015,
was rejected.
It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the juvenile has been falsely implicated in this case. Police after investigation has filed charge-sheet
against the accused-petitioner and trial commenced in which statement of PW-1 Shankar Lal has been recorded, who has not specifically alleged that
accused-petitioner fired at him. It was also submitted that the co-accused Ajay has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 22.8.2019 the
case of the accused-petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the co-accused. Counsel for the petitioner submits that accused- petitioner is in
custody since 10.6.2019. The hearing of revision will take time. Probation Officer has found the conduct and behaviour of the accused-petitioner is
good and there is nothing to adverse him.
Considering the fact that Juvenile in conflict with law is to be enlarged on bail in normal circumstances and only in exceptional circumstances bail can
be rejected if the Court is of the opinion that grant of bail would bring the Juvenile in association with known criminal and it would have a negative
impact on him. Further there is no material available on record to come to the conclusion that release of juvenile would bring him in association with
criminals, this revision-petition deserves to be allowed. The impugned orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board as well as the learned Appellate
Court are set-aside.
The present revision petition is accordingly allowed. It is directed that accused-petitioner Anil Kumar be released on bail, provided his natural guardian
mother, furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- alongwith two sureties in the like (3 of 3) [CRLR-2510/2019] amount to the satisfaction
of the concerned Juvenile Justice Board with the stipulation that she shall produce the accused-petitioner before the concerned Juvenile Justice Board
on all dates, till the enquiry or trial is completed. His natural guardian mother shall ensure that the juvenile in conflict with law maintains good conduct
and behaviour.
