AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 203 wordsPetitioner through his natural guardian father Shri Gyanmal @ Ganmal has preferred this revision petition aggrieved by order dated 03.03.2020 passed
by Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Ajmer (Rajasthan) whereby the application filed by the petitioner under section 12 of the Juvenile
Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act was rejected.
It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a juvenile and the trial may take long time. Counsel further submits that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in this matter. Therefore, the criminal revision may be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the revision petition.
I have considered the contentions.
The revision petition is allowed. It is directed that petitioner be released on bail, provided his natural guardian father Shri Gyanmal @ Ganmal,
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Juvenile Justice
Board with the stipulation that he shall produce the petitioner before the concerned Juvenile Justice Board on all dates, till the enquiry or trial is
completed. His natural guardian father shall ensure that the juvenile in conflict with law, maintains good conduct and behaviour.