High CourtsSingle Bench

Anil Saini vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 December 2024 · Citation: (2024) 12 UK CK 0051

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 22
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2355 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 133 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.167 of 2023, under Sections 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Ramnagar, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.

4.

Learned State Counsel admits this fact.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.