High CourtsSingle Bench

Sahjad Ansari vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 December 2024 · Citation: (2024) 12 UK CK 0087

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 22
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 866 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 133 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 90 of 2024, under Section 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police

Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.

4.

Learned State counsel admits this fact.

5.

Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the Court concerned.