High CourtsSingle Bench

Antony Davis vs Renu Raj

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 30 June 2023 · Citation: (2023) 06 KL CK 0415

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mohammed Nias. C.P., J
CASE NUMBER
Contempt of Court Case (Civil) No.194 of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 227 words

Mohammed Nias. C.P., J

This contempt of court case (Civil) is filed alleging non-compliance with the judgment dated 28.10.2022 in WP(C)No. 3564 of 2017. Earlier an order was passed on 28.1.2023 without reference to the directions of this Court, which directed specific consideration to the documents mentioned in the judgment dated 28.10.2022. Accordingly, this Court passed the following order on 17.03.2023 :-

“On behalf of the Government, a memo is filed producing the order passed in purported compliance of the judgment of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents which were produced in the writ petition which is mentioned in the judgment has not been considered by the respondent while passing the fresh order.

2.

The learned Government Pleader is directed to get instructions on the same. Needless to say that if the documents referred to in the judgment are not considered as directed, the respondent has not complied with the judgment. If that is so, the respondent will ensure compliance of the order by passing orders in compliance with the directions given in the judgment.

Post on 4.4.2023. ”

Thereafter, a fresh order is passed on 8.5.2023 referring to the documents directed to be considered. Accordingly, the contempt of court case (civil) is closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 8.5.2023, if so advised.