High CourtsSingle Bench

Anupama Biswal vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 2 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 OHC CK 0004

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. K. Sahoo, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294, 323, 498A, 506 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No.6509 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 361 words

S.K. Sahoo, J

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

3. This is an application under section 438 of Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with Jajpur P.S. Case No.175 of

2021 corresponding to C.T. Case No. 940 of 2021 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur for alleged commission of offences under sections

498-A, 323, 294, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. Perused the F.I.R. annexed to the anticipatory bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No.1 is the mother in-law and petitioner no.2 is the

brother in-law of the informant and the main allegation is against the husband of the informant, the offences are triable by Magistrate, the case arises

out of a matrimonial dispute and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to release the petitioners on anticipatory bail and

accordingly, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they shall be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer

with further conditions that they shall make themselves available for interrogation by the I.O. as and when required and they shall not directly or

indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing any facts

to the Courts or to the investigating Officer. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

6. The ABLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

7. As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order

available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide

Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25th March 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April 2021.