AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
20 paragraphs · 346 wordsS.Pujahari, J
The Petitioners apprehending their arrest in Kamakhya Nagar P.S. Case No.204 of 2021, corresponding to G.R. Case No.335 of 2021, pending in the
court of S.D.J.M., Kamakhya Nagar registered for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 323 and 506/34 of the I.P.C.
read with Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, have filed this petition for their release on pre-arrest bail.
Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned counsel for the State.
Perused the F.I.R. allegations.
It appears that the matter arises out of marital discord.
Regard being had to the facts and submissions made, especially the nature of accusation, circumstances in which the offences stated to have been
committed and the fact that the matter arises out of marital discord and also it being not disputed that the Petitioners’ release on pre-arrest bail
shall not be an hindrance to a free and fair investigation, this Court is of the view that the Petitioners have made out a case for their release on pre-
arrest bail, more particularly when they are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and they have no chance of absconding and/or
tampering with the prosecution evidence, if released on pre-arrest bail.
Hence, this Court directs that in the event of arrest of the Petitioners in connection with the aforesaid case, they be released on bail by the Officer
effecting arrest on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper.
However, the aforesaid order is subject to the condition that the Petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation and no other graver offence is
reported against the Petitioners besides the aforesaid offences.
The ABLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of being allowed.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available
in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s
Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No.4798, dated 15th April, 2021.
