High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 AP CK 2028

Arava Bhanubee vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 6 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5591 OF 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 409 words

Instant Criminal Petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha, 2023, has been filed on behalf of the petitioner herein (A1), seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.345 of 2024 of Bhogapuram Police Station, Vizianagaram District, for the offences punishable under Section 196(1), 336(1), 352, 353(2) and 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 and Section 66 read with 43 & 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000-2008.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the Order dated 15.07.2026, he has taken notice on respondent No.2 and filed a memo of proof of service to that effect.

3.

Despite service of notice, none represented respondent No.2.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, has confined his argument to the extent of protecting the petitioner herein from the police on the ground that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven (07) years and prays this Court to direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5.

On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor did not oppose the same and concurred with the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for the reason that the offences alleged are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years.

6.

Heard. Perused the entire available material on record.

7.

Since the offences alleged in FIR in Crime No.345 of 2024 of Bhogapuram Police Station, Vizianagaram District are punishable with imprisonment of less than seven years and in view of the no objection expressed by the Assistant Public Prosecutor, this Court directs the respondent/police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 corresponding to Section 41A Cr.P.C., scrupulously as per the guidelines enunciated in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another1, which was reiterated in the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Satendar Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another2 in FIR in Crime No.345 of 2024 of Bhogapuram Police Station, Vizianagaram District.

8.

If it is noticed in the course of investigation that the petitioner has committed any offence which is punishable with imprisonment beyond seven years, the investigating officer is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.

9.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.

Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.

Footnotes

  1. 1.(2014) 8 SCC 273
  2. 2.2026 SCC OnLine SC 162