High CourtsSingle Bench

Ashal Kumar Thapa And Another vs State Of Sikkim

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 3 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 SIK CK 0016

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 02 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 110 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Mr. Rahul Rathi, Learned Counsel for the Petitioners verbally seeks time on grounds that Learned Senior Counsel, Mr. N. Rai had to suddenly leave station on unavoidable urgent personal work.

Mr. Yadev Sharma, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that he was informed of it last evening and has no objection to the prayer for time.

In the circumstances, list on 11-04-2023 as found convenient by the parties.

The Stay granted vide Order of this Court dated 12-05-2022 shall continue till further Orders of this Court.

On the next date Learned Counsel for the parties shall come prepared and no adjournment on any ground shall be granted.