High CourtsSingle Bench

Union Of India & Ors. vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 10 April 2025 · Citation: (2025) 04 SIK CK 0668

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 38 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 97 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The matter is listed today for further hearing. However, Mr. Avinash Dewan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 to 23 submits that the matter is to be argued by Mr. Jorgay Namka, learned Senior Advocate, who however could not appear today due to his personal problems, as he is travelling out of state on an urgency. The adjournment sought for is not opposed by the learned Deputy Solicitor General of India as well as the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for their respective parties.

2.

List on 05.05.2025.